Feeds:
Inlägg
Kommentarer

Archive for the ‘Hardellgruppen’ Category

År 2002 utvärderades cancerrisken för ELF-EMF av IARC vid WHO. Slutsatsen blev möjligen cancerframkallande Grupp 2B for människa, d.v.s. samma som för radiofrekventa elektromagnetiska fält (RF-EMF) i den utvärdering av IARC som gjordes 2011.

I vår epidemiologiska studie av olika riskfaktorer för gliom samlade vi in yrkesuppgifter för samtliga patienter och kontrollpersoner ur befolkningen.

Vi har analyserat exponeringen för ELF-EMF (μT) i olika yrken. Sammanlagd yrkesexponering ökade risken för den mest elakartade varianten av gliom (glioblastoma multiforme) med oddskvot 1,9, 95 % konfidensintervall 1,4 – 2,6 i den högsta exponeringsgruppen, dvs närmast fördubblad risk, i tidsintervallet 1-14 år före diagnos. Ingen ökad risk sågs för längre tidsintervall (15+ år) eller för andra typer av gliom. Riskökningen var alltså statistiskt signifikant.

Resultatet visar att ELF-EMF ökar risken för glioblastom sent i cancerutvecklingen (närmaste tiden före diagnos), dvs promotion/progression av tumören. Exponering för ELF-EMF och radiofrekventa fält (RF-EMF) från trådlösa telefoner är i vår studie oberoende riskfaktorer för glioblastom. I motsats till ELF-EMF ökar RF-EMF risken även för andra typer av gliom.

Annonser

Read Full Post »

I en ny artikel publicerad i en vetenskaplig tidning har vi utvärderat sambandet mellan användning av trådlösa telefoner (mobiltelefoner och trådlösa bordstelefoner; DECT) och gliom, d.v.s. en av de vanligaste typerna av hjärntumörer. Vi använde oss av de synpunkter på ett orsakssamband som publicerades 1965 av Sir Austin Bradford Hill i England. Han utarbetade 9 ”kriterier” som användes i kontroversen rökning och lungcancer. Samma metod kan även användas för att utvärdera sambandet mellan andra miljögifter och cancer.

Kravet är inte att alla kriterier behöver uppfyllas, eftersom kunskapsläget för tillfället kan vara bristfälligt inom ett visst område, som Bradford Hill påpekade. Dock gäller vissa förhållanden, t.ex. att exponeringen bör föregå sjukdomen, det bör finnas ett dos-effektsamband, d.v.s. att högre exponering ger en högre risk, och att det bör finnas stöd i experimentella studier.

Vår utvärdering grundas på studier på människa och laboratoriestudier på djur och i cellkulturer. Vår slutsats är att de synpunkter som Bradford Hill publicerat om ett orsakssamband är uppfyllda och att gliom orsakas av den radiofrekventa (RF) strålningen från trådlösa telefoner:

The nine Bradford Hill viewpoints on association or causation regarding RF radiation and glioma risk seem to be fulfilled in this review. Based on that we conclude that glioma is caused by RF radiation. Revision of current guidelines for exposure to RF radiation is needed.

Sambandet utvärderades av International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) vid WHO i maj 2011. Slutsatsen blev att RF strålning är möjligen cancerframkallande för människan (Grupp 2B enligt deras definition). Det vetenskapliga stödet för ett samband har därefter ökat betydligt och RF strålning bör nu anses vara en cancerrisk för människan (Grupp 1). Ny utvärdering av IARC är nödvändig.

I vår nya artikel beskriver vi även vetenskapliga kontroverser inom området med starkt inflytande från industrin, som givetvis inte vill påvisa några risker. En nyckelspelare är International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation (ICNIRP), en privat organisation i Tyskland som utser sina egna medlemmar och som inte öppet deklarerar sina bidragsgivare. ICNIRP är industrivänlig och har dessutom ett stort inflytande inom WHO. ICNIRP anger mycket hög riktlinje (guideline) för RF strålning vilket i praktiken ger grönt kort för olika typer av apparater/prylar som avger RF strålning. Detta möjliggörs genom att ICNIRP grundar sitt ’gränsvärde’ på enbart uppvärmning och bortser från alla resultat som inte beror på uppvärmning av vävnad, så kallad ‘non-thermal’ effekt. Det innebär att ICNIRP bortser från en mycket stor del av den vetenskapliga litteraturen inom området.

Vid WHO pågår arbetet med ett nytt kriteriedokument om RF strålning och hälsa. Tyvärr är nästan samtliga personer som har det huvudsakliga ansvaret (core group) för monografin medlemmar av ICNIRP, se tabell nedan. Detta är en intressekonflikt som tyvärr inte har åtgärdats av WHO. Det har kommit krav på att dessa personer bör bytas ut, vilket är rimligt.

 

Medlemmar inom WHO för nytt kriteriedokument om RF strålning och hälsa och deras medlemskap i ICNIRP och andra grupper

Name WHO ICNIRP UK/AGNIR SSM SCENIHR
Simon Mann X X X
Maria Feychting X X X X*
Gunnhild Oftedal X X
Eric van Rongen X X X
Maria Rosaria Scarfi X X* X X
Denis Zmirou X

*former

WHO: World Health Organization; ICNIRP: International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection; AGNIR: Advisory Group on Non-Ionising Radiation; SSM: Strålsäkerhetsmyndigheten (Swedish Radiation Safety Authority); SCENIHR: Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks

 

Etikprövningsnämnden vid Karolinska Institutet i Stockholm bedömde redan 2008 att medlemskap i ICNIRP kan utgöra en intressekonflikt och bör anges då en medlem av ICNIRP uttalar sig om hälsorisker av den radiofrekventa strålningen t ex från trådlösa telefoner, basstationer och annan trådlös kommunikation (Karolinska Institute Diary Number 3753-2008-609). Detta beslut tycks ignoreras helt.

Den femte generationen, 5G, av RF strålning står för dörren. Den så kallade utvecklingen går med expressfart utan att vi har debatt i media, bland beslutsfattare eller allmänhet om konsekvenser för människa och miljö. Teknikfixering och telekomindustrins vinstintresse är pådrivande utan att negativa effekter diskuteras.

 

Read Full Post »

Vi publicerade nyligen i en vetenskaplig artikel resultaten av mätningar av den radiofrekventa (RF) strålningen i Gamla Stan gjorda i april 2016. Mycket höga värden påvisades framför allt på torg, i synnerhet Järntorget. Dessa värden ligger långt över nivåer där olika biologiska effekter påvisats för RF strålning vilket diskuteras i artikeln. Resultaten visar olämpliga placeringar av basstationer med för höga strålvärden.

Read Full Post »

Vi mätte den radiofrekventa (RF) strålningen på centralstationen i Stockholm i november 2015. Resultaten har publicerats och vi diskuterar även biologiska effekter av strålningen och det gränsvärde som används. Detta är satt av ICNIRP, en privat tysk organisation, och baseras på uppvärmning av mikrovågor varvid man negligerar andra biologiska effekter som inte beror på uppvärmning av vävnaden.

I studien använde vi oss av apparatur (EME Spy 200) som mäter 20 olika RF-band i området 88 till 5850 MHz. Medianvärdet uppgick till 921 µW/m2 (eller 0,092 μW/cm2; 1 μW/m2=0.0001 μW/cm2) med en del höga värden över 95 544 µW/m2 (6 V/m), dvs över högsta möjliga mätvärdet för apparaten. Medelvärdet för total RF strålning varierade mellan 2817 och 4891 µW/m2 för de olika mätomgångarna.

Särskilt hög strålning uppmättes på en del ställen, så kallade hot-spots, se bild. Bilden visar bottenplan av centralstationen med färgskala för områden med särskilt hög strålning.

t-central-ground-plans-heat-map

Ett annat ställe med hög strålning exemplifieras av bilden nedan. En man står med sin smartphone intill en väggmonterade basstation, se pilen. Strålningen från basstationen (GSM +UMTS 900) var högre än högsta möjliga mätvärdet för EME Spy 200, 95 544 µW/m2.

imgp5647a

I stort sett alla uppmätta mätvärden överskred 30 till 60 µW/m2 som är lägsta nivån för biologiska effekter enligt BioInitiative Working Group 2012. Det gränsvärde som används i Sverige är satt av ICNIRP men är föråldrat och baseras inte på aktuell kunskap. Utöver möjliga hälsoeffekter av strålningen är det viktigt att mäta den aktuella strålbelastningen i miljön inte minst med hänsyn till den snabba teknikutvecklingen som ger ökad RF strålning i framtiden, t.ex. utbyggnaden av 5G nätet. Den radiofrekventa strålningen måste betraktas som ett miljögift som växer i omfattning.

Read Full Post »

Incidensen av cancer i sköldkörteln i de nordiska länderna ökar enligt statistik från de nordiska cancerregistren, med en tydlig brytpunkt 2006, enligt en studie som publicerats av vår forskargrupp. Incidensen ökade statistiskt signifikant från 2006 till 2013 för kvinnor med 6,16 % årligen (95 % Cl +3,94, +8,42 %) och för män med 6,84 % (95 % Cl +3,69, +10,08 %). Enligt det svenska cancerregistret var det främst den strålkänsliga papillära typen som ökade, även där med en tydlig brytpunkt år 2006 för kvinnor, +9,58 % (95% Cl +5,85, +13,44 %). För män fanns ingen motsvarande brytpunkt. Där var den årliga uppgången för de undersökta åren 1993-2013 +3,95 % (95 % Cl +2,20, +5,73 %).

Cancer i sköldkörteln är en relativt ovanlig cancer med totalt 157 fall bland män och 429 fall bland kvinnor enligt det svenska cancerregistret år 2013. Den är 2-3 ggr vanligare hos kvinnor än hos män. Ökad screening efter sköldkörtelcancer har uppgetts som en möjlig orsak till den ökande incidensen. Ökad exponering för radioaktiv strålning har visat en tydlig incidensökning av den papillära typen efter de två kärnkraftsolyckorna i Tjernobyl och Fukoshima redan inom tre år och speciellt hos barn. Även den ökande användningen av röntgenundersökningar med exponering av sköldkörteln kan ha bidragit till uppgången.

En orsak som behöver undersökas vidare är radiofrekvent strålning, vilket vi diskuterar i artikeln. Uppgången i incidens av sköldkörtelcancer sammanfaller med den starkt ökande mobiltelefonanvändningen. Antennen, som tidigare var uppåtriktad, har nu på de flesta smartphones flyttats till nedre delen av mobilen, vilket ger en ökad stråldos till sköldkörteln, se figur. En smartphone kan dessutom ha ytterligare antenner för trådlös kommunikation.

 

thyroid-cancer-incidence-figure-10Figur. Placering av antennen i förhållande till sköldkörteln.

 

Read Full Post »

Det första utkastet till monografi om hälsoeffekter av radiofrekventa fält från WHO innehåller många sakfel som vi påpekat tidigare. Vi har nu påtalat detta på nytt och skickat till WHO brev enligt nedan. IARC har fått samma brev med begäran om ny utvärdering av cancerrisker.

 

 

World Health Organization                                                              4 August, 2015

 

Dr Margaret Chan, Director General

World Health Organization

Avenue Appia 20, 1211 Geneva 27

Geneva, Switzerland

 

Emelie van Deventer, Team Leader

Radiation Programme Department of Public Health,

Environmental and Social Determinants of Health,

World Health Organization

Geneva, Switzerland

 

Dear Ms. Margaret Chan

Dear Ms. Emelie van Deventer

 

Further Comments on the WHO draft: Radio Frequency fields: Environmental Health Criteria Monograph

On 15 December, 2014 we submitted comments on the WHO draft on radio frequency fields and health. Since we have not got a satisfactory reply from WHO, not seen a revision of the draft, and adding to that more published studies that reinforce the increased risk for certain brain tumours associated with use of wireless phones we want to submit the following, additional comments.

The brain is the primary target organ for exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) during the use of the handheld wireless phone. This has given concern of an increased risk for brain tumours. The carcinogenic effect of RF-EMF on humans was evaluated at a meeting during 24 – 31 May 2011 at the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) at WHO in Lyon, France. One of us (LH) was part of the expert group. The Working Group categorised RF-EMF from mobile phones, and from other devices that emit similar non-ionising electromagnetic fields in the frequency range 30 kHz–300 GHz, as a Group 2B, i.e. a possible, human carcinogen (http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol102/mono102.pdf).

Since then more studies have been published that strengthen the association between use of wireless phones (mobile and cordless phones) and increased risk for brain tumours. We have performed long-term research in this area and in the following we give a short up-dated summary of our findings based on research since the 1990’s. In our publications relevant information can be found also on other studies, as well as discussions of the current scientific evidence.

Glioma:

Glioma is a malignant brain tumour (“brain cancer”), and the most common type is glioblastoma multiforme with a poor prognosis. We have published a statistically significant increased risk for glioma among users of both mobile and cordless phones. The risk increased with latency (time from first use of the phone until tumour diagnosis) and cumulative number of hours for use. Highest risk was found in the area of the brain with highest exposure to RF-EMF. All these results are of biological relevance; that is what would be expected for a causal association. The full paper can be read here:

http://www.pathophysiologyjournal.com/article/S0928-4680(14)00064-9/pdf

Meningioma:

Menigioma is mostly a benign brain tumour and accounts for about 30 % of all intracranial tumours. The incidence is approximately 2-times higher in women than in men. No conclusive evidence of an association between use of mobile and cordless phones and meningioma was found in our study. However, taking the long latency periods that have been reported for the increased meningioma risk associated with exposure to ionizing radiation it is still too early to make a definitive risk assessment. Results for even longer latency periods of wireless phone use than in our study are desirable, see more details here:

http://www.spandidos-publications.com/or/33/6/3093

Acoustic neuroma:

Acoustic neuroma or Vestibular Schwannoma is a rare benign tumour in the eighth cranial nerve that leads from the inner ear to the brain. It grows slowly and does not undergo malignant transformation, but may give compression of vital brain stem centres. Tinnitus and hearing problems are usual first symptoms of acoustic neuroma. We published a clear, statistically significant, association between use of mobile and cordless phones and acoustic neuroma. The risk increased with time since first use. For use of both mobile and cordless phones the risk was highest in the longest latency group. Tumour volume increased per 100 hours of cumulative use and year of latency for wireless phones indicating tumour progression from RF-EMF. The whole study can be read here:

http://www.spandidos-publications.com/ijo/43/4/1036

Brain tumour prognosis:

A causal association would be strengthened if use of wireless phones has an impact on the survival of glioma patients. We analyzed survival of 1,678 glioma patients in our case-control studies 1997-2003 and 2007-2009. Use of wireless phones in the > 20 years latency group (time since first use) yielded increased hazard ratio (HR) = 1.7, 95 % confidence interval (CI) = 1.2-2.3 for glioma, i.e. decreased survival. Increased HR was found for use of both mobile and cordless phones. Highest HR was found for cases with first use before the age of 20 years. These results strengthen a causal association between use of wireless phones and glioma. The publication can be read here:

http://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/11/10/10790

Risk in different age groups of first use:

In our glioma study we found highest risk for subjects with first use of mobile or cordless phone before the age of 20, see Table 8 in the publication:

http://www.pathophysiologyjournal.com/article/S0928-4680(14)00064-9/pdf

We published similar results for acoustic neuroma and use of mobile phones, see Table 21.2:

http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.433.7480&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Children and adolescents are more exposed to RF-EMF than adults due to thinner skull bone, higher conductivity in the brain tissue, and a smaller head. The developing brain is also more vulnerable than in adults and it is still developing until about 20 years of age. The finding of higher risk in young persons is worrying, not the least due to the high prevalence of use of wireless phones in children and adolescents.

Brain tumour incidence:

It is not correct to claim that the incidence of brain tumours has not increased in the Scandinavian countries. The age-standardized incidence of brain tumours increased dramatically in Denmark with +41.2 % among men and +46.1 % among women during 2003-2012 (http://www.ssi.dk/Aktuelt/Nyheder/2013/~/media/Indhold/DK – dansk/Sundhedsdata og it/NSF/Registre/Cancerregisteret/Cancerregisteret 2012.ashx).

Due to the well-known under-reporting of brain tumours to the Swedish Cancer Registry we studied brain tumour rates using the Swedish National Inpatient Register and the Causes of Death Register (see http://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/12/4/3793/htm ). In summary we found a statistically significant increasing rate of not specified brain tumours from 2007 in the Inpatient Register and from 2008 in the Causes of Death Register. Our study indicated that several of these tumours were never reported to the Swedish Cancer Register. The results are in accordance with a reasonable latency period for use of wireless phones, e.g. mobile phones, see Figures 5 and 6 in our publication. Thus, the Swedish Cancer Register data cannot be used to dismiss an increased risk for brain tumours associated with use of wireless phones. On the contrary our study is consistent with an association considering a reasonable tumour induction period.

Mechanistic aspects:

Reactive oxygen species:

RF-EMFs do not cause direct DNA damage. On the other hand numerous studies have shown generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that can cause oxidative damage of DNA. This is a well-known mechanism in carcinogenesis for many agents. The broad biological potential of ROS and other free radicals makes radiofrequency radiation a potentially hazardous factor for human health, not only cancer risk but also other health effects. A recent update can be read here:

http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.3109/15368378.2015.1043557

-Tumour promotion:

Tumour promotion by RF-EMF exposure was reported in 2010 in a study on mice: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20545575. These findings were recently replicated and add to the relevance of tumour risk: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25749340

-p53:

The p53 protein is a transcription factor that plays a vital role in regulating cell growth, DNA repair and apoptosis, and p53 mutations are involved in disease progression. In a recent study it was found that use of mobile phones for ≥3 hours a day was associated with increased risk for the mutant type of p53 gene expression in the peripheral zone of astrocytoma grade IV (glioblastoma multiforme), and that this increase was statistically significant correlated with shorter overall survival time:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4178273/

 These results are in agreement with the decreased survival for patients with astrocytoma grade IV (glioblastoma multiforme) associated with long-term use of mobile phones and cordless phones that we reported in 2014, see above the section on prognosis.

Causality:

To further evaluate strengths of evidence Sir Austin Bradford Hill wrote in the 1960’s a famous article on association or causation at the height of the tobacco and lung cancer controversy: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1898525/pdf/procrsmed00196-0010.pdf

Hill offered a list of nine aspects of an association to be considered when deciding if an association is causal. However, he did not request all nine viewpoints to be fulfilled for causality. We used the Hill criteria to evaluate the causality on brain tumour risk from RF-EMF emitted from wireless phones. We concluded that based on the Hill criteria, glioma and acoustic neuroma should be considered to be caused by RF-EMF emissions from wireless phones and regarded as carcinogenic to humans, classifying it as Group 1 according to the IARC classification. See more here:

http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/reveh.2013.28.issue-2-3/reveh-2013-0006/reveh-2013-0006.xml

Conclusion:

Our results are in agreement with other studies such as the international Interphone study and the French CERENAT study. This is discussed in more detail in e.g. our article on glioma risk, see also:

http://www.pathophysiologyjournal.com/article/S0928-4680(12)00110-1/pdf

The so called Danish cohort study on mobile phone users has been taken as evidence of no risk. However, the many shortcomings as reviewed elsewhere makes the study inconclusive regarding assessment of cancer risk. It should not be cited as evidence of no risk, for more details see: http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/reveh.2012.27.issue-1/reveh-2012-0004/reveh-2012-0004.xml?format=INT

In summary there is consistent evidence of increased risk for glioma and acoustic neuroma associated with use of mobile phones and cordless phones. Furthermore, the risk is highest for persons with first use before the age of 20, which is of special concern. Our conclusion is that RF-EMF should be regarded as a human carcinogen. The IARC classification should be updated to at least Group 2A, a probable human carcinogen. Current guidelines for exposure need to be urgently revised. The WHO Monograph draft on this issue is based on selective inclusion of studies and wrong assessment of the evidence of increased risk. Thus the Danish cohort study on mobile phone users and the Swedish Cancer Register data cannot be used as evidence of no increased risk. It is important that the public and decision makers are given correct information about the cancer risk so that they can make decisions based on correct data and take precautions. Otherwise there is an obvious risk of forthcoming increasing impairment of human health and increasing numbers of cancer in the population. We anticipate correction of the Monograph and your reply to this letter no later than 15 September, 2015. If you so wish our research group may of course give a presentation at WHO on this topic.

Yours sincerely,

 

Lennart Hardell, MD, PhD

Department of Oncology

University Hospital

SE-701 85 Örebro

Sweden

 

Michael Carlberg, MSc

Department of Oncology

University Hospital

SE-701 85 Örebro

Sweden

Read Full Post »

Ms. Margaret Sullivan, Public Editor                                       July 24, 2015

Ms. Carol Pogas, Reporter

 

The New York Times

Regarding: Cellphone Ordinance Puts Berkeley at Forefront of Radiation Debate http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/22/us/cellphone-ordinance-puts-berkeley-at-forefront-of-radiation-debate.html?_r=0

Published online July 21, 2015

Dear Ms. Sullivan and Ms. Pogas,

We have read this article in the New York Times with interest. However, there are several mistakes, and even wrong statements, on the health hazards from exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) from cell phones in the article. In the following we want to correct some of the false statements.

The brain is the primary target organ for exposure to RF-EMF during the use of the handheld wireless phone. This has given concern of an increased risk for brain tumours. The carcinogenic effect of RF-EMF on humans was evaluated at a meeting during 24 – 31 May 2011 at the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) at WHO in Lyon, France. One of us (LH) was part of the expert group. The Working Group categorised RF-EMF from mobile phones, and from other devices that emit similar non-ionising electromagnetic fields in the frequency range 30 kHz–300 GHz, as a Group 2B, i.e. a possible, human carcinogen (http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol102/mono102.pdf).

Since then more studies have been published that strengthen the association between use of  wireless phones (mobile and cordless phones) and increased risk for brain tumours. We have performed long-term research in this area and in the following we give a short up-dated summary of our findings based on research since the 1990’s. In our publications relevant information can be found also on other studies, as well as discussions of the current scientific evidence.

Glioma:

Glioma is a malignant brain tumour (“brain cancer”), and the most common type is glioblastoma multiforme with a poor prognosis. We have published a statistically significant increased risk for glioma among users of both mobile and cordless phones. The risk increased with latency (time from first use of the phone) and cumulative number of hours for use. Highest risk was found in the area of the brain with highest exposure to RF-EMF. All these results are of biological relevance; that is what would be expected for a causal association. The full paper can be read here: http://www.pathophysiologyjournal.com/article/S0928-4680(14)00064-9/pdf

Meningioma:

Meningioma is mostly a benign brain tumour and accounts for about 30 % of all intracranial tumours. The incidence is approximately 2-times higher in women than in men. No conclusive evidence of an association between use of mobile and cordless phones and meningioma was found in our study. However, taking the long latency periods that have been reported for the increased meningioma risk associated with exposure to ionizing radiation it is still too early to make a definitive risk assessment. Results for even longer latency periods of wireless phone use than in our study are desirable, see more details here: http://www.spandidos-publications.com/or/33/6/3093

 Acoustic neuroma:

Acoustic neuroma or Vestibular Schwannoma is a rare benign tumour in the eighth cranial nerve that leads from the inner ear to the brain. It grows slowly and does not undergo malignant transformation, but may give compression of vital brain stem centres. Tinnitus and hearing problems are usual first symptoms of acoustic neuroma. We published a clear, statistically significant, association between use of mobile and cordless phones and acoustic neuroma. The risk increased with time since first use. For use of both mobile and cordless phones the risk was highest in the longest latency group. Tumour volume increased per 100 hours of cumulative use and year of latency for wireless phones indicating tumour progression from RF-EMF. The whole study can be read here: http://www.spandidos-publications.com/ijo/43/4/1036

Brain tumour incidence:

It is not correct to claim that the incidence of brain tumours has not increased in the Scandinavian countries. The age-standardized incidence of brain tumours increased dramatically in Denmark with +41.2 % among men and +46.1 % among women during 2003-2012 (http://www.ssi.dk/Aktuelt/Nyheder/2013/~/media/Indhold/DK – dansk/Sundhedsdata og it/NSF/Registre/Cancerregisteret/Cancerregisteret 2012.ashx).

Due to the well-known under-reporting of brain tumours to the Swedish Cancer Registry we studied brain tumour rates using the Swedish National Inpatient Register and the Causes of Death Register. In summary we found a statistically significant increasing rate of not specified brain tumours from 2007 in the Inpatient Register and from 2008 in the Causes of Death Register. Our study indicated that several of these tumours were never reported to the Swedish Cancer Register. Thus, the Swedish Cancer Register data cannot be used to dismiss an increased risk for brain tumours associated with use of wireless phones. On the contrary our study is consistent with an association considering a reasonable tumour induction period, see more here: http://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/12/4/3793

Mechanistic aspects:

It is correct that RF-EMFs do not cause direct DNA damage. On the other hand numerous studies have shown generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that can cause oxidative damage of DNA. This is a well-known mechanism in carcinogenesis for many agents. The broad biological potential of ROS and other free radicals makes radiofrequency radiation a potentially hazardous factor for human health, not only cancer risk but also other health effects. A recent update can be read here: http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.3109/15368378.2015.1043557

Causality:

To further evaluate strengths of evidence Bradford Hill wrote in the 1960’s a famous article on association or causation at the height of the tobacco and lung cancer controversy. Hill offered a list of nine aspects of an association to be considered when deciding if an association is causal. However, he did not request all nine viewpoints to be fulfilled for causality. We used the Hill criteria to evaluate the causality on brain tumor risk from RF-EMF emitted from wireless phones. We concluded that based on the Hill criteria, glioma and acoustic neuroma should be considered to be caused by RF-EMF emissions from wireless phones and regarded as carcinogenic to humans, classifying it as Group 1 according to the IARC classification. Current guidelines for exposure need to be urgently revised. See more here: http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/reveh.2013.28.issue-2-3/reveh-2013-0006/reveh-2013-0006.xml

Conclusion:

Our results are in agreement with other studies such as the international Interphone study and the French so called CERENAT study. This is discussed in e.g. our article on glioma risk. In summary there is consistent evidence of increased risk for glioma and acoustic neuroma associated with use of mobile phones and cordless phones. Furthermore, the risk is highest for persons with first use before the age of 20, which is of special concern. Our conclusion is that RF-EMF should be regarded as a human carcinogen. The IARC classification should be updated to at least Group 2A, a probable human carcinogen. It is necessary to give the public correct information on the cancer risk. The precautionary principle should be used to minimize exposure to RF-EMF. Media have an important role to inform in a balanced way. Unfortunately this article in the New York Times is biased towards the no risk assumption. It should be corrected based on facts and not wishful thinking.

Yours sincerely,

 

Lennart Hardell, MD, PhD

Department of Oncology

University Hospital

SE-701 85 Örebro

Sweden

 

Michael Carlberg, MSc

Department of Oncology

University Hospital

SE-701 85 Örebro

Sweden

 

 

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »